Elizabeth 'Pocahontas' Warren Admits She Is "Not a Person of Color"

4,879 Views | 4 Replies | Last: 7 yr ago by Mag Tiger
Judge_Smails
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMAO. and this is the best they can do. Democrat party heavyweight.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/12/elizabeth-pocahontas-warren-admits-she-is-not-a-person-of-color/
Mag Tiger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't think it's a coincidence the Dem Party is full of goofs like her. Amazing how so many folks fall for the "woe is me, I'm a victim" mentality of this reprobate sham of a political party. Like Moon says, Dems are the party of filth.
Mansura
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let me get this straight. You have a problem with this, but no problem with the president sleeping with a porn star weeks after his wife gave birth? You have no problem with the president of United States repeatedly lying about the payments be made to stormy Daniels? You have no problem with the president of the United States and his attorney Michael Cohen talking like mobsters about our friend Dave and the sea full of dirt he has on Trump and how they should purchase it in case the National Enquirer guy gets hit by a bus? On top of everything Russia and negotiating with Russia to build at Trump Tower in Moscow in the middle of the election? No issue there? You have no issue with Rex Tillerson who Successfully ran one of the largest corporations in the world for many years saying the president repeatedly directed them to violate the law?
Mag Tiger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wonder how many times Trump used his supposed infidelities for political/academic gain like Warren did with her fraudulent heritage claims? Do you know the answer to that, or are you comparing apples to oranges again? No one here, to my knowledge, has as blindly covered for Trump's personal failings as you cover the innumerable failings of your people on the left. No one, and it's not even close. You're a lawyer. I'd expect better argument of issue than what you're doing at present.
jandk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mag Tiger said:

I wonder how many times Trump used his supposed infidelities for political/academic gain like Warren did with her fraudulent heritage claims? Do you know the answer to that, or are you comparing apples to oranges again? No one here, to my knowledge, has as blindly covered for Trump's personal failings as you cover the innumerable failings of your people on the left. No one, and it's not even close. You're a lawyer. I'd expect better argument of issue than what you're doing at present.


Quite amusing for sure. Remember 100 claimed to be a lawyer. At this point we were all trolled, Mansura a lawyer, if so his clients must suffer. Because he's not very good at debates or facts
Mag Tiger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jandk said:

Mag Tiger said:

I wonder how many times Trump used his supposed infidelities for political/academic gain like Warren did with her fraudulent heritage claims? Do you know the answer to that, or are you comparing apples to oranges again? No one here, to my knowledge, has as blindly covered for Trump's personal failings as you cover the innumerable failings of your people on the left. No one, and it's not even close. You're a lawyer. I'd expect better argument of issue than what you're doing at present.


Quite amusing for sure. Remember 100 claimed to be a lawyer. At this point we were all trolled, Mansura a lawyer, if so his clients must suffer. Because he's not very good at debates or facts
Yeah, it gets to a point where you have to laugh at it all. At this time, I don't think he even knows the depth of absurdity his pov is.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.