Mag Tiger said:
ZZTIGER said:
Mag Tiger said:
ZZTIGER said:
Richyb83 said:
It was called "Global Warming" back then. Then they were having trouble explaining the record blizzards and such and so now it's called "Climate Change". Funny, banks worldwide are not hesitating to lend $Billions for seaside resorts etc. They don't seem too worried about oceans rising. You can bet all you own that this is a world wide scam to create entirely new industries, jobs, regulations, taxation and ultimately massive wealth. If you bet the stock market, you can count on green energy type start up companies doing very well. It's very obvious what is happening.
And,,,,,a very recent former president, now shadow president, owns an exclusive estate on Martha's Vineyard. He's not too worried about rising sea levels, nor should he be. He continues to do his part to perpetuate the scam of "man caused climate change".
The biggest problem of all is 90% of American voters are stupid.
I can agree with this in principle. But, I think its more along the lines of people being ignorant. Folks would be much better off abandoning the discredited media and instead focus on getting news from outlets deemed more trustworthy and honest in their reporting. People need to start saying NO to the MSM.
Mag, now you've opened Pandora's box. Now you get the "long form" explanation of why I chose the word stupid. I can type fairly fast so it doesn't take too long to put my thoughts into words. So, I apologize in advance.
I did choose my words carefully and thought about whether to use the word "ignorant" or "stupid" and decided that the latter was the more accurate description of the problem as I see it. I think that like the "ignorant" is often misused and misunderstood, the word "stupid" is too.
I do think that both terms are at play with most people. When I use the word "stupid" (meaning: showing great lack of common sense) I'm referring to the masses of people who don't have the common sense to realize that they are blindly accepting of the Liberal Left's claim that the world is in a state of "Climate Change" that is man made. These people blindly accept the Liberal Left's claim that "Climate Change" is a "thing" without realizing that they have never heard an actual "debate" of any kind discussing both sides of this topic. That is by design. The Liberal Left "claimers" and media have no intension of allowing the American public to see any actual scientific debate on this topic. Why? This topic is the basis for "The Green New Deal".
The Green New Deal is a world wide scam and has been from the beginning.
The United States Government makes zero products.
The only money that the United States Government gets is from taxation and regulation.
If they can't tax you and regulated you they have no money.
So, in looking for the grandest way to tax and regulate the population on a world wide level, what is the one subject/topic that can be pointed at virtually anything and everything such that is could be taxed or regulated as having a "carbon footprint" of some sore; THE GREEN NEW DEAL and Climate Change.
You can close your eyes and point at anything and make the claim that it has to regulated because it has a carbon footprint. That is exactly their plan to ensure that the government of the world have a mechanism to tax and regulate anything they want. This ensures they have revenue and money forever; so they think.
The Green New Deal is a gigantic world wide scam.
I don't think I've ever heard any scientist on either side of this issue actually deny that the climate is changing. The climate is constantly changing and has been for billions of years.
That having been said, when you consider the number of people that have blindly jumped onto this issue on the side of the Liberal Left without ever considering what actual criteria this this claim is based on. OK, people say there is such a thing as "Global Warming". Oh, then the term changed to "Climate Change". Why? So, then the question for an inquisitive person should automatically be "what scientific data is there to suggest that the earth's climate is being changed by humans such that we are headed for some natural disaster"?
So, let's make clear that nobody is not in favor of cleaning the planet of trash and pollutants. Certainly, we all would love to be rid our planet of any pollutant that would negatively affect our planet.
Have you ever heard the Liberal Left "Climate Change" claimers on CNN or MSNBC suggest if they are in favor of raising the CO2 level on earth or lowering the CO2 levels on earth? This is never clarified. It never will be clarified. Most of these people talking on TV have no idea what they are even talking about.
Have you ever heard the Liberal Left "Climate Change" claimers ever explain why the world banks are still lending money for $Billion dollar projects on the ocean front properties all over the world if the oceans are rising? Hell, even Barrack Obama just purchased a $14million dollar property on the ocean in Martha's Vineyard.
Current CO2 levels in earth's atmosphere are at 400 ppm.
If the CO2 level on earth were to drop to 200 ppm or lower, all plant life and vegetation on the planet earth would begin to die. Mass famine would occur long before we reach that point.
The CO2 levels on earth have been proven through ice cores to have been over 1000 ppm and even 2000 ppm in earth's past history.
As for understanding CO2 levels on the planet and what is causing it.
The Pacific Ocean alone is an area of over 50,000,000 square miles with methane vents all over the ocean floor spewing methane 24/7/365. This is putting CO2 into the atmosphere around the clock. Scientist have zero idea how many of these vents there are or where they are located. Same is true of natural occurring crude oil leaking into the ocean from cracks in the ocean floor. This has always been happening since time began. Who can measure this?
A single volcano eruption can instantly change the CO2 levels in the atmosphere for years.
So, when I used the word "stupid" I did think it through and I also think that the word "ignorant" is most definitely also applicable. I just think that people that blindly accept whatever they hear without first being cynical about it's accuracy are technically stupid people. They lack common sense. Personally, I don't trust anything I hear in the media from either side of any issue. It may take me quite a long time to vet an issue to get me to comfort level that I think I know what is going on. On some issues I may never decide to take a position because I simply don't feel I have enough information.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fthespun.com%2Fsec%2Flsu%2Flsu-football-donte-starks-arrest-gun-suspension-ed-orgeron&psig=AOvVaw3sR3KdLJzfUGCOlCKL2SHx&ust=1594905192398000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAIQjRxqFwoTCKC6mICrz-oCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAF
